Daily position in United States. Higher on the graph is better (rank 1 is the top).
None of these apps were in the top free chart in United States during this period. Try another country or chart.
Rating breakdown
Share of ratings at each star level. A big 1★ bar means many unhappy users.
Ulfa: Invitations & Cards
★ 5.00 · 1 ratings
The App Store doesn't publish the star breakdown.
Stylebook
★ 4.66 · 393 ratings
The App Store doesn't publish the star breakdown.
Store page, money and tech
How each app sells itself on the store, how it makes money, and what devices it needs.
Ulfa: Invitations & CardsStylebook
Store page
Name lengthBoth stores allow 30 characters25 / 309 / 30
Short descriptionGoogle Play, up to 80 characters——
Description370 words590 words (leader)
Screenshots810 (leader)
Promo videoGoogle Play
—
#18 · Spain · Top Paid
Last updatedYesterday17 months ago
ReleasedOct 13, 2026Oct 29, 2009
PriceFree29.9 BRL
In-app purchases——
Contains ads——
CategoryLifestyleLifestyle
Content rating4++9
Version1.710.1
Tracked by Risewatchs since14 Nov 20269 Oct 2026
—
—
LanguagesApp Store16 (leader)
Money
In-app purchases——
In-app price rangeGoogle Play——
Contains ads——
Tech
App size11.4 MB20.4 MB
RequiresiOS 17.0 or lateriOS 17.0 or later
Growth
New ratings per day is the best free sign of how many people are downloading right now: more new ratings means more new players.
Ulfa: Invitations & C…Stylebook
Ulfa: Invitations & CardsStylebook
New ratingsIn this period0359 (leader)
New ratings per dayAverage012 (leader)
Rating change—+0.28 (now ★ 4.66)
InstallsGoogle Play milestone——
Where they rank today
Best position in each country's top charts. The 10 countries where these apps are strongest.
Ulfa: Invitations & CardsStylebook
Spain—#18 Paid
United States—#41 Paid
Australia—#46 Paid
Netherlands—#51 Paid
Austria—#51 Paid
Philippines—#61 Paid
Japan—#86 Paid
Brazil—#94 Paid
Updates and store page changes
What each app changed, and when. Compare the dates with the rank graph to see what worked.
Ulfa: Invitations & CardsStylebook
UpdatesNew versions in this period00
Store page changesIcon, screenshots, name, texts0296
14 Nov 2026StylebookDescription
14 Nov 2026StylebookScreenshots
14 Nov 2026
Stylebook
Description
14 Nov 2026StylebookScreenshots
14 Nov 2026StylebookDescription
14 Nov 2026StylebookScreenshots
14 Nov 2026StylebookDescription
14 Nov 2026StylebookScreenshots
14 Nov 2026StylebookDescription
14 Nov 2026StylebookScreenshots
13 Nov 2026StylebookDescription
13 Nov 2026StylebookScreenshots
13 Nov 2026StylebookDescription
13 Nov 2026StylebookScreenshots
13 Nov 2026StylebookDescription
13 Nov 2026StylebookScreenshots
13 Nov 2026StylebookDescription
13 Nov 2026StylebookScreenshots
13 Nov 2026StylebookDescription
13 Nov 2026StylebookScreenshots
13 Nov 2026StylebookDescription
13 Nov 2026StylebookScreenshots
13 Nov 2026StylebookDescription
13 Nov 2026StylebookScreenshots
13 Nov 2026StylebookDescription
13 Nov 2026StylebookScreenshots
12 Nov 2026StylebookDescription
12 Nov 2026StylebookScreenshots
12 Nov 2026StylebookDescription
12 Nov 2026StylebookScreenshots
What users complain about
From each app's saved English reviews. The red cell is where an app gets the most complaints, which is your chance to do better.
Ulfa: Invitations & CardsStylebook
Reviews analysed0244
Negative reviews1–2★ share—11%
Developer repliesShare of reviews answered—0%
Reply speedTypical time to answer——
Too many ads% of negative reviews—0%
Crashes and bugs% of negative reviews—8%
Pay to win, prices% of negative reviews—27%
Too hard, unfair% of negative reviews—0%
Lag, slow, battery% of negative reviews—0%
Lost progress, account% of negative reviews—0%
Internet, connection% of negative reviews—4%
Boring, repetitive% of negative reviews—0%
Bad update% of negative reviews—12%
Controls, interface% of negative reviews—8%
Ulfa: Invitations & Cards
Not enough negative reviews yet.
Stylebook
Biggest complaint: pay to win, prices
“Purchased this to start tracking my closet, but saw several typically female-gendered categories such as "dresses" and "heels" but missing typically male-gen…”
